Not like us gay

Certified Lover Boy? Certified pedophiles. The song contains lyrics explicitly accusing Drake of being a pedophile, set to a catchy beat and propulsive gay. Accordingly, Plaintiff fails to state a claim for harassment…. A federal judge has dismissed Drake’s defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group over Kendrick Lamar’s hit diss track “Not Like Us.” The ruling marks the legal culmination of a.

In light of the overall context in which the statements in the Recording were made, the Court holds that it cannot. Even if the Court accepted Plaintiff's pleadings on information and belief, Plaintiff still has not stated a claim for relief under section Plaintiff has not sufficiently alleged deceptive practices that are consumer oriented.

Notwithstanding this precedent, Plaintiff attempts to bring a claim for harassment under section A person commits harassment in the second degree when they hold the "intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person" and "engage[] in a course of conduct or repeatedly commit[] acts which alarm or seriously annoy such other person and which serve no legitimate purpose.

The Amended Complaint does not indicate how any of the deceptive practices allegedly utilized by UMG harmed consumers. Section prohibits "[d]eceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any business, trade or commerce or in the furnishing of any service.

“Not Like Us” is Kendrick Lamar’s fourth diss track directed at Drake, released on the evening of May 4,less than 24 hours after the release of “meet the grahams,” his third. Key points Drake's defamation lawsuit over Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us" has been dismissed by a judge.

The forum here is a music recording, in particular a rap "diss track," with accompanying video and album art. The fact that the Recording was made in the midst of a rap battle is [also] essential to assessing its impact on a reasonable listener…. Drake alleges that UMG intentionally published and promoted "Not Like Us" while knowing that the song's insinuations that he has sexual relations with minors were false and defamatory.

District Judge Jeannette A. Vargas ruled that the song "can only reasonably be. That the Recording can only reasonably be understood as opinion is reinforced by the language employed in the song. Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Here are the relevant lyrics quoted from "Not Like Us," though there were more songs quoted from the rap battle:. Ain't you tired? A short excerpt from Judge Jeannete Vargas's long opinion in Graham v. Diss tracks are much more akin to forums like YouTube and X, which "encourag[e] a freewheeling, anything-goes writing style," than journalistic reporting.

The penultimate song of this feud, "Not Like Us" by Kendrick Lamar, dealt the metaphorical killing blow. The lawsuit Drake filed against Not Music Group for alleged defamation has been dismissed by a federal judge. While these covert practices of providing financial incentives to undisclosed third parties and leveraging of business relationships, if they exist, may be facts that are "peculiarly within the possession and control of" UMG, Plaintiff's allegations —based on what boils down to like online commentary—do not form a "sufficient factual basis such that there is a 'reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of illegality.

A federal judge ruled that the 'vitriolic war of words' used ryan guzman is gay the Kendrick. UMG Recordings, Inc. This case arises from perhaps the most infamous rap battle in the genre's history, the vitriolic war of words that erupted between superstar recording artists Aubrey Drake Graham "Drake" and Kendrick Lamar Duckworth "Lamar" or "Kendrick Lamar" in the spring of Over the course of 16 days, the two artists released eight so-called "diss tracks," with increasingly heated rhetoric, loaded accusations, and violent imagery.

The average listener is not under the impression that a diss track is the product of a thoughtful or disinterested investigation, conveying to the public fact- checked verifiable content…. New York does not recognize a civil cause of action for harassment.

Tryna strike a chord and it's probably A-Minor.